Hollywood to YouTube: What Have You Done for Me Lately?

Warner Musics Led Zeppelin in Concert

Warner Music's Led Zeppelin in Concert

Warner Music Group’s decision to take down videos and music on Google’s YouTube reflects the music industry’s frustration that video sharing on the Internet still isn’t paying off.

Warner Music, says the Wall Street Journal, had expected to garner more advertising revenue from the video site — proof once again the big audiences doesn’t necessarily guarantee big revenue. YouTube earns only about $200 million this year, a tiny fraction of Google’s total revenue.

Google pays licensing fees to music companies when users click on advertising content. But clearly, online video has a long way to go before it pays its way for Hollywood content.

Posted under Michael's Blog

This post was written by Michael Stroud on December 24, 2008

Tags: , , ,

Itsmy.com’s Mobile Social Video is Quiet Hit

If you think mobile social video is a no-go in the U.S., you might consider Itsmy.com, which claims 2.5 million users of its personal broadcasting service worldwide, with half of them American.

The site ((http://m.itsmy.com on
your mobile phone) lets anyone with a video-enabled mobile phone create
their own mobile “TV show” for free and share it with other friends,
family or love prospects.

The company’s fixed Internet site is bare-bones and unapologetically devoid of uploading capabilities.

“We are convinced that we don’t need an Internet site for our users,” says Sabine Irrgang, COO of Munich-based GoFresh, which owns Itsmy.com. “Many are not interested, or they don’t even have a computer.”       MORE

Posted under Michael's Blog

This post was written by mikestroud on September 14, 2008

Tags: , , ,

Veoh CEO Dmitry Shapiro at iHollywood Mixer

Veoh CEO Dmitry Shapiro joined USA Today journalist Jefferson Graham at iHollywood Forum’s first iHollywood Mixer last month in Culver City. Excerpts:



Posted under Michael's Blog, Video

This post was written by mikestroud on August 14, 2008

Tags: , ,

Yahoo’s Gilford to Discuss Online TV Strategy

Yahoo! Entertainment and Lifestyle General Manager Karin Gilford will explain at Digital Media Summit on Monday how Yahoo! TV grabbed 3 million more unique visitors in April than arch rival AOL Television in April.

Gilford said in a brief chat that Yahoo! climbed to the top of the online television category by focusing on launches of original online shows and working closely with cable networks to promote their programs.

"We’re in a world where everybody has a library of movie trailers, TV shows and full-length movies online," Gilford said.  "How do you rise above the crowd?"

Gilford will give Yahoo’s answer to that question on Monday in a fireside chat with Hollywood Reporter Deputy Editor Andrew Wallenstein.

AOL Video Vice President Peter Kooks will undoubtedly have a different take when he appears on a panel exploring strategies for jumpstarting consumers’ demand for video-on-demand.

Both Yahoo! and AOL undoubtedly benefited from the end of the Hollywood writers’ strike as starved consumers accessed their favorite shows any way they could.

According to comScore Media Matrix, Yahoo TV led the category with 15.6 million visitors, a 38% jump from the previous month, followed by AOL Television with 12.5 million visitors and MySpace TV with 12 million visitors.

But video was also partly behind Yahoo’s fall to Google as the most-visited U.S. website in April. Helped by YouTube, Google Sites edged Yahoo Sites for the first time, 141.1 million visitors to 140.6 million visitors, comScore said.

comScore Vice President Leslie Darling will lead of Digital Media Summit on Monday with new findings about reaching the online video 3.0 audience.


See Also

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by Michael Stroud on June 5, 2008

Tags: , , , , , ,

Horrors! Online Auditions!

Filmaka promises to create A-list directors out of ordinary people who submit videos online. Massify.com is pulling the same stunt with actors, urging its community to vote on who should get the top 20 acting slots in a horror film.

In a contest ending today (Friday), aspiring actors uploaded auditions to the site that were then judged by their peers. Whether those votes actually count toward who gets cast is a question I can’t yet answer; as I write, the site is down to "tally votes" and I haven’t yet had a chance to interview the founders.

 Actress Deborah Geffner ("All That Jazz", "Monk", "ER", "Infestation", among many others) heard about the site when her agent told her she should audition for a horror movie called Ghosts in the Machine. The audition, which was filmed, went like any of the dozens of others she’s done. Then the casting director told her an online community would vote on whether her audition was worth considering — and she would have to upload the video herself.

"I thought that was the real horror movie," she said. "It took me four days to do it."

Check out her audition below.

 

See Also

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by Michael Stroud on April 25, 2008

Tags: , , , ,

‘Gossip Girl’ TV Ratings Rise After New Shows Pulled from Web

Apparently, pulling new episodes of "Gossip Girl" from the Web didn’t hurt CW’s re-launch of the show on Monday, although whether the show benefits in the long-term remains to be seen. CW said the freshman show’s Nielsen ratings were 25% ahead of its season average and its third-best showing ever on Monday night. CW decided to pull new episodes of the show from the Web in an effort to bolster its TV audience, where its real advertising dollars lie. The experiment is being closely watched by other networks such as ABC, NBC and Fox, which have largely made their hit TV shows available for free on the Internet.

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by Michael Stroud on April 23, 2008

Tags: , , , ,

Big Brother in the Living Room?

Talk about a tempest in a teapot.

A Comcast executive’s revelation at Digital Living Room last week that the cable company is testing cameras in its DVRs in the living room set off a storm of angry blogs.

It began when Chris Albrecht of NewTeevee quoted Gerard Kunkel, Comcast’s senior vice president of user experience, as saying the company is testing cameras that recognize you when you turn on your cable box, allowing your TV set to make recommendations about what you might want to see, or to serve up tailored ads.

The angry comments started on the New Teevee site, ranging from "officially the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard in my life" to "Comcast is trying to make Orwell’s vision of 1984 come true". From there the commentary spread to PC World  (Comcast’s Creepy Experiment) and the New York Times, among other places).

Kunkel responded to the outcry with a posting of his own on NewTeeVee, emphasizing that Comcast’s experimental camera-based gesture recognition device is "in no way designed to – or capable of – monitoring your living room".

The incident illustrates once again the morass cable companies and telephone companies are potentially stepping into as they continue to offer "triple play" services that combine TV, high-speed Internet and telephone service. Even if Comcast’s system doesn’t currently offer in-room monitoring, it clearly could without too much modification. And you can bet that when it becomes a reality, the government in its search for "terrorists" will be close behind.

It’s only fair to mention, however, that panelists at the show also talked about more benign uses for such technologies: monitoring a home when a family is away, for example, or allowing family members to monitor elderly parents.

As we move toward two-way video communication in the home, these issues are going to only intensify. It’s good to have an early heads-up.

See Also

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by Michael Stroud on March 25, 2008

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Virtual Living Room

Ken Pyle’s Observations on Digital Living Room

Although the title of iHollywood’s conference this week was, the Digital Living Room, The Virtual Living Room would have an equally good description. A common theme throughout the show was the idea of portability and that consumers want to be able to consume entertainment on their own terms; wherever they are and whatever time it is.  OK, so this thought has become almost trite, but what was significant was the caliber of speakers who were echoing this theme. 

Jim Wuthrich, SVP Electronic Sell Through & Interactive Marketing of Warner Brothers Digital Distribution, pointed to the studios’ efforts to stay at the forefront of business model changes when he indicated that now it is, “Time for experimentation and try to figure out how to make content more accessible in the form they [consumers] want.”  Wuthrich went on to say that, the challenge for the studios is how to make the various models co-exist.   

He pointed out that theatrical release window is a very important part of the marketing for particular properties. He agreed, to a degree, with panel moderator, Kara Swisher of the Wall Street Journal, and her assertion that, at some point, producers could effectively bypass the studio system and go directly to the consumer via the Internet. He didn’t think it would necessarily happen with the bigger producers, like a Lucas, but that it would probably happen with smaller producers.    

Warner is working with many channels to get their content to the consumer, especially via the Internet. He suggested that consumers do not want to be locked into one service and there has not been a good solution for getting content from the Internet to the TV. He believes the ultimate solution will integrate broadband video directly into the television, eliminating the set-top. He emphasized the only way to unlock the value of the studios’ content is to make it easy for the consumer to discover and consume.

He stated that, “people are running out of time.” The studios are competing with so many ways to spend time that never used to exist; from gaming to social networking, that extending beyond the living room is important. Thus, portability and mobility is important to Warner Brothers going forward. 

Dan Simpkins, CEO of Hillcrest Laboratories, made a suggestion for a new kind of cross between mobility and video, when he envisions the possibility of using a cell phone as a television remote. Hillcrest has been thinking of this that the integration of their motion sensing navigation technology (think Wii) into cell phone is possible and would not affect form factors. When coupled with an iPhone-like user interface, the cell phone could serve as a search tool, meta-data screen and remote control, while the television does what it does best. 

A virtual living room may ultimately reside in a virtual computer; the so-called cloud computer. Ron Ferguson, SVP and GM of North America of Archos, thinks it is a matter of time before people rely on cloud computing, but for the time being it will be on a hard-drive. Archos finds that they cannot keep up with demand for storage; people want more and more storage on their personal media devices. Bryan Burch, Director of HP’s Managed Home Business unit, thought that consumers will always want to have some level of tangible ownership of content, so some of it may always be stored in the home. 

If Pandora, with 11 million registered users, is an indication of the direction of media, then the virtual living room is already here. Pandora knows the kind of music you like. It allows you to play your music in the living room, pause it and continue it on your cell phone. It streams through the Internet. Jessica Steel, VP, Business Development, says that their goal is, “to beat Clear Channel.” If that comes to pass, repercussions will go well beyond the living room.

For more Ken Pyle blogs, visit www.viodi.com

See Also

Posted under Michael's Blog

This post was written by Michael Stroud on March 22, 2008

Tags: , , , , , , ,

iPhone: What Happens Next

Way back when, people used to say you couldn’t watch video on a cellphone. “Nobody wants to watch a movie on a tiny screen,” people scoffed at our conferences. “Not to mention the terrible quality of video streaming over the mobile Internet.”

Then along came the iPod Video, and I opined in my blog that the issue wasn’t so much the size of the screen. It was the clarity, and whether the eyes were being tricked into seeing a bigger screen (Remember those cool Sony VR goggles that plug into your DVD player)?

Apple proved with the iPod Video that people would download TV shows to that tiny device by the thousands, and it didn’t look half bad.

Now comes the iPhone, and we have (much as I hate to use this phrase) a paradigm shift.

Forget for a moment the lousy Internet, the indifferent phone service and the lack of a video camera. Here’s what iPhone’s introduction really means:

1) The screen works. The iPhone’s screen is the sharpest, most colorful, largest display ever put on a cellphone. Flip it sideways and you have a fine medium for viewing movies. Not everywhere, not always, but sometimes. That’s huge.

2) It’s a true iPod. The iPhone marks the irrevocable movement of music to cellphones. Yes, it existed before. But as with MP3 players, it didn’t “matter” to millions of consumers until Steve Jobs put his imprimatur on it. Music on phones is now a fashion statement.

3) It’s a computer.  With features such as a  mini-Safari browser, YouTube, Google maps, and a surprisingly usable virtual keyboard, the iPhone is  – or soon will become — a general purpose device. That’s what launched the first Apple computers in the 1970s.

4) It’s a blank canvas. There’s something about that big, blank, buttonless screen that says “use me”.  How long until people scribble notes, take voice memos and use their iPhones as remote control to their TVs? No buttons means all the functionality flows from software.

5) The competition is watching. Just as the first Apples spurred IBM to create the PC and Microsoft to create MS-DOS, the iPhone will spur every phone and computer company to try to create something similar. Clunkier, but competitive. It’s already happening. At a cellphone store near you.

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by Michael Stroud on July 3, 2007

Tags: , , ,

IPTV Mea Culpa

When I used to interview job applicants, I’d ask them if they know what IPTV is.

"It’s television over IP,” they’d reply. "You know, Internet television."

"It is not," I’d snarl. "It’s the telcos getting into television. TV over phone lines. AT&T and Verizon, and those hundreds of rural telcos, too.”

Of  course, they’d never get the job.

Well, my reply would also get me the boot at any online video company.

Yes, IPTV is about those telcos taking on the cable and satellite companies. But it’s really about how video is becoming platform-independent. The video on your broadband will soon become the same video on your TV and your mobile phone.

That fact was made dramatically clear at last week’s IPTV World conference at NAB 2007 by the presence of a Revver executive on the opening panel, "Battle for Eyeballs”.

Revver, a user-generated video site, has a deal with Verizon to supply video to both its Fios IPTV and Vcast mobile services.

Its content also plays on Jack Black’s experimental Acceptable.tv TV show on VH1. Watchers get to vote on just how acceptable that content is via cellphones or the Internet.

How cool is that? Think that qualifies as IPTV?

Thinking of video is something that’s passively watched on a clunky TV is passe. It’s time for me to get with the program.

See Also

Posted under Uncategorized

This post was written by Michael Stroud on April 26, 2007

Tags: , , ,